• Users Online: 87
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
SPECIAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 101-105

Advanced interventions for common pain conditions in women


1 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Maryland Rehabilitation Center, USA
4 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
5 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, PA, USA

Date of Submission02-Jun-2020
Date of Decision08-Jul-2020
Date of Acceptance30-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication12-Nov-2020

Correspondence Address:
Prof. Areerat Suputtitada
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Rama 4 Road, Patumwan, Bangkok 10330
Thailand
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jisprm.jisprm_25_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Pain syndromes affecting women have a significant global impact. There is increasing evidence that chronic pain affects a higher proportion of women than men around the world; unfortunately, women are less likely to receive treatment. Moreover, women generally experience more recurrent pain, more severe pain and longer-lasting pain than men. Pain conditions are more prevalent in women such as fibromyalgia, chronic pelvic pain and lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy and postpartum. Gender differences in pain sensitivity, pharmacological therapy, and nonpharmacological pain interventions have also been reported. It is becoming evident that gender differences in pain and its relief arise from an interaction of genetic, anatomical, physiological, neuronal, hormonal, psychological and social factors that modulate pain differently.

Keywords: Common pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, lumbopelvic pain, pelvic pain, postpartum, pregnancy, women


How to cite this article:
Suputtitada A, Chen CP, Young M, Segal NA, O’Young B. Advanced interventions for common pain conditions in women. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med 2020;3:101-5

How to cite this URL:
Suputtitada A, Chen CP, Young M, Segal NA, O’Young B. Advanced interventions for common pain conditions in women. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 28];3:101-5. Available from: https://www.jisprm.org/text.asp?2020/3/4/101/300597




  Introduction Top


Accumulating scientific evidence indicates that chronic pain affects a higher proportion of women than men around the world; yet unfortunately, women are less likely to receive treatment.[1],[2],[3] Moreover, women generally experience more recurrent pain, more severe pain and chronic pain than men.[1],[2],[3] Pain conditions that are more prevalent in women include fibromyalgia (FM), chronic pelvic pain (CPP), prenatal and postpartum musculoskeletal conditions.[1],[2],[3],[4] FM and irritable bowel syndrome are common disorders that are often found in women with CPP.[4] Women with CPP have a higher prevalence of FM and irritable bowel syndrome than the general population.[4] Aberrant pain processing and psychosocial stressors are implicated in the co-occurrence of these pain syndromes called chronic overlapping pain conditions.[5],[6],[7] Advances in neuroscience have demonstrated that male and female brains are different.[5],[6] Human bodies maintain and adjust to a careful balance of sex-specific hormonal cocktails that influence biology.[1],[2],[3] Gender differences in pain sensitivity, pharmacological therapy, and nonpharmacological pain interventions have also been reported.[1],[2],[3] It is becoming evident that gender differences in pain and its relief arise from an interaction of genetic, anatomical, physiological, neuronal, hormonal, psychological and social factors, which modulate pain differently.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7] Chronic pain is associated with central sensitization, a phenomenon of synaptic plasticity, and increased neuronal responsiveness in central pain pathways after painful insults.[7],[8] It is also stimulated by neuroinflammation in the peripheral and central nervous system (CNS). A characteristic feature of neuroinflammation is the activation of glial cells, such as microglia and astrocytes, in the spinal cord and brain, leading to the release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines which are powerful neuromodulators and cause hyperalgesia and allodynia after CNS administration.[5],[6],[7]

Evidence reveals significant gender differences in the association between gray matter (GM) metrics and pain-related psychosocial characteristics.[5],[6],[7] These findings indicate that, in women, reduced GM area and volume of several central brain regions (i.e., paracentral, postcentral, precentral, and supramarginal) associate to a greater extent with perceived negative consequences of the illness, perceived emotional representations, and pain catastrophizing, compared to men.[5],[6] Also, the more women perceive chronicity, the less GM thickness in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex. In men with nonspecific chronic spinal pain, precentral area GM and insula volume are inversely related to perceived personal control of the illness. GM area and volume of the precuneus cortex relates more positively with perceived personal control and more negatively with kinesiophobia in men compared to women. Finally, perceived symptom fluctuations are inversely associated with precentral volume in men, whereas they are more positively associated with lingual thickness in women.[5],[6],[7]

FM affects more women than men. The treatment is quite challenging, since there are multiple symptoms besides severe chronic widespread pain. Its pathophysiology is related to central sensitization, involving both brain and spinal mechanisms. Greater brain activation in response to pain-related upregulation of ascending facilitation pathways and deficits in descending spinal inhibitory influences have been found in FM.[8],[9] Typical FM symptoms such as allodynia or hyperalgesia can be explained by central sensitization.[8],[9] The diagnostic criteria, combining a widespread pain index (WPI) and severity scale (SS) for fatigue, nonrestful sleep and cognitive problems, with WPI >7, SS >5 OR WPI 4–6, SS >9 had 88.1% accuracy for the diagnosis of FM.[9],[10],[11] Once a diagnosis of FM has been confirmed, a multidisciplinary treatment strategy has been recommended. The first-line and most commonly used pharmacological treatments are pregabalin, duloxetine and milnacipran. Treatment is challenging because the symptoms of FM vary by patient. A multidisciplinary approach, including medications, acupuncture, low-level laser therapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation exercise and cognitive behavior therapy, is recommended to manage FM patients.[9],[10],[11] Moderate evidence shows that higher pain intensity and pressure pain sensitivity are related to decreased regional GM volume in brain regions encompassing the cingulate cortex, the insula, and the superior frontal and temporal gyrus.[9],[10],[11],[12] Further, some evidence exists that longer disease duration is correlated with decreased total GM volume. Structural and functional brain alterations within regions involved in somatosensory, affective, and cognitive pain processing play a crucial role in the persistent pain of chronic MSKP patients.[5],[6],[7],[8],[13] Accordingly, these brain alterations have to be taken into account when assessing and treating patients with chronic pain. Two methods of noninvasive brain stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have been recommended. The stimulation at M1 was more effective in pain reduction than the stimulations at the primary sensory cortex or supplementary motor areas with navigation-guided rTMS.[13] The analgesic effects of M1 stimulation can change thalamic and subthalamic nuclei and modulate the affective component of pain.[14] Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation coupled with the limbic system can modulate pain processing and perception. Pain inhibition mediated by descending fibers through the prefrontal cortex has been proposed. Level A (definite efficacy) for analgesic effect of high-frequency (HF) rTMS of the primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the pain area and the antidepressant effect of HF-rTMS of the left DLPFC.[13],[14] Level B recommendation (probable efficacy) of tDCS is endorsed for: (i) anodal electrode applied at the left primary motor cortex (M1) and cathodal electrode applied at the right orbitofrontal area in FM; (ii) anodal electrode applied at the left DLPFC and cathodal electrode applied at the right orbitofrontal area in cognitive function, major depressive episode without drug resistance. [15] FM is caused by dysfunction of the CNS but current treatments are mostly ineffective.[16] tDCS, a neuromodulation technique that targets the CNS, may offer a new line of treatment. A Systematic review of the most up-to-date literature including a meta-analysis of the effects of tDCS on pain intensity in FM. Fourteen clinical studies were analyzed. Ten were controlled trials and 4 were within-subject crossover studies. Meta-analysis of data found that tDCS is a safe intervention with the potential to lower pain intensity in FM. However, the high heterogeneity and risk of bias across studies suggest a need for further empirical research.[17] rTMS is an emerging therapeutic option for this condition. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing rTMS (irrespective of the stimulation protocol) to sham for treating FM pain intensity, depression, and/or quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. The outcomes assessed closest to the 30th day after rTMS treatment were extracted. rTMS demonstrated superior effect on QoL. This effect, may involve pain modulation. The level of evidence is 1b.[18]

CPP occurs more commonly in women.[8],[9],[12],[19],[20],[21],[22] There are many causes, all requiring accurate diagnoses to develop an appropriate treatment plan to reduce the pain. Vulvodynia and deeper pelvic issues such as pelvic floor myalgia and tendinopathy have been traditionally difficult to diagnose and adequately treat.[19] In addition, women with CPP have a higher prevalence of FM and irritable bowel syndrome than the general population.[8],[9],[12],[19] Aberrant pain processing and psychosocial stressors are implicated in the co-occurrence of these pain syndromes (chronic overlapping pain conditions).[8],[9],[12],[19] More evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of these and other chronic overlapping pain conditions are needed to improve care for women.[8],[9],[12],[19] Interventional procedures can play an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in different types of pelvic pain syndromes, including: pudendal neuralgia, piriformis syndrome, and “border nerve” syndrome (ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and genitofemoral nerve neuropathy).[8],[9],[12],[19],[20] Ultrasonography allows visualization of the muscles and nerves and provides opportunities for real-time injections. Pudendal neuralgia commonly presents as chronic debilitating pain in the penis, scrotum, labia, perineum, or anorectal region.[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25] The experts' consensus and low-level evidence suggests that treatments provided by physical therapists for patients with CPP are therapeutic exercises, manual therapy (internal and/or external), biofeedback, breathing techniques, and electrical stimulation to improve muscle function and decrease pain. Traditional medical treatments for CPP include oral analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs] and opioids), hormonal suppression, tricyclic antidepressants, muscle relaxants, and even anticonvulsants. Additional interventions include injection therapy (using anesthetics or botulinum toxin A), neuromodulation, and surgery.[19]

In patients with pelvic floor musculoskeletal pain, several injection treatments can be performed using musculoskeletal ultrasound guidance.[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25] Caudal epidural injection is the administration of medications into the epidural space via the sacral hiatus proven efficacy for CPP.[19],[20] This injection technique is used for the treatment of low back pain caused by lumbosacral nerve root compression. Successful caudal epidural injection relies on the accurate placement of a needle into the epidural space (sacral canal) through the sacral hiatus.[21] Medial branch blocks to the lumbosacral area have proven to be effective for CPP.[19],[20] Accurate medial branch blocks can be performed using ultrasound guidance.[20],[22] A curvilinear transducer is preferred for medial branch blocks. The patient is placed in the prone position and the transducer is placed in the transverse plane in relation to the lumbosacral spine. In this plane, the facet joint and the transverse process can be clearly seen. The medial branch is located at the 90° angle between the facet joint (superior articular process) and the transverse process. In-plane injection is performed in a lateral to medial approach. Under in-plane guidance, the needle can be clearly visualized during the entire injection process. [20,22.23] Pudendal nerve injection has been shown to be effective in treating pelvic floor pain.[19],[20] With the patient in the prone position, the curvilinear transducer is preferred for pudendal nerve injection. The transducer is placed in a transverse plane in relation to the sacrum. The transducer is then moved in a proximal to distal direction. Distal to the ischial spine, two hypoechoic bands can be visualized under ultrasound. One is the sacrotuberous ligament, and the other one is the sacrospinous ligament. The needle is then inserted in a medial to lateral direction, injected into the space between these two ligaments as the pudendal nerve is located here.[25] Positioning a patient for ultrasound-guided examination and injection of the piriformis muscle. The patient assumes the prone position during ultrasound-guided examination. A curvilinear transducer is preferred. The sacral hiatus is identified first; afterward, the transducer is moved in a lateral direction towards the greater trochanter. The piriformis muscle is located between the lateral border the sacrum and the greater trochanter. The piriformis muscle appears as a hyperechoic band deep in the gluteus maximus muscle. The sciatic nerve appears as an oval-shaped structure deep in the piriformis muscle.[26]

Pelvic girdle pain is a specific type of low back pain that commonly arises in relation to pregnancy, affecting an estimated 1 in 5 women.[27],[28],[29] Traditionally, women have been advised that pain is an inevitable part of pregnancy, and little effort has been made on the part of the medical community to offer prevention or treatment strategies. This “grin and bear it” attitude suggests that pain during pregnancy is normal, not treatable, and will resolve completely after delivery. Yet, current research on pain in pregnancy dispels such beliefs as out-of-date myths.[27],[28],[29]

Given that women carry pregnancies, lumbopelvic pain (LPP) during pregnancy and postcaesarean section pain are two important pain syndromes in women. LPP of pregnant women is very frequently left untreated due to care providers and patients assuming that it will spontaneously resolve with delivery. However, LPP is a significant source of lost work and social time.[27],[28],[29] Furthermore, pain persists following delivery in a substantial number of women and can persist for >1–2 years after delivery.[27],[28],[29] Risk factors associated with ongoing LPP include greater severity during pregnancy, earlier onset and inability to return to prepartum weight. This phenomenon is likely insufficiently understood, as the prevalence of low back pain is greater in women than in men and >10% women with chronic low back pain attribuitale to pregnancy.[27],[28],[29]

Evaluation of acute pelvic pain in pregnancy and the postpartum period is difficult. Knowledge of the clinical settings and sonographic features of acute pelvic pain in pregnancy and the postpartum period can lead to accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of the condition.[30] Certain analgesics may increase the risk for adverse fetal and pregnancy outcomes, while inadequate pain management can lead to adverse maternal outcomes such as depression, and hypertension. Paracetamol and NSAIDs are appropriate for mild to moderate pain, but NSAIDs should be avoided in the third trimester because of various risks. Short courses of weaker opioids are generally safe in pregnancy, although neonatal abstinence syndrome must be monitored in the third-trimester administration. Limited safety data for pregabalin and gabapentin indicate that these are unlikely to be major teratogens, and tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors have limited but overall reassuring safety data. Treatment should be tailored to the lowest therapeutic dose and shortest possible duration, and management should involve a discussion of risks and benefits and monitoring for a response. Further research is required to better understand the safety profile of various analgesics in pregnancy.[31]

There is low-quality evidence that exercise (any exercise on land or in water), may reduce pregnancy-related low-back pain.[32] However, there is moderate-to low-quality evidence suggesting that any exercise improves functional disability and reduces sick leave more than usual prenatal care.[32] There is evidence of physical activity interventions enhancing physical activity levels of pregnant women. Furthermore, they are potentially useful in alleviating pregnancy-related pain and psychological symptoms, reducing gestational weight gain, and increasing self-efficacy in enhancing physical activity levels among these individuals.[33]

Another common cause of postpartum pain is caesarean section. While the precise cause of this pain syndrome is incompletely understood. The scar pain, loss of anterior core muscle integrity and dysfunctional uterine bleeding due to a pocket-forming in the uterine scar are potential etiologies.[34],[35],[36] A key to reducing risk for postpartum caesarean section pain becoming chronic is an early and effective treatment.[34],[35],[36]

The common persistent vaginal and perineal pain after vaginal delivery may relate to perineal trauma. History of pregnancy-related and prepregnancy back pain and heavier body weight are risk factors for persistent back pain after pregnancy. Interventional studies targeting the most vigorously associated, targeting modifiable risk factors, such as acute postpartum pain, may lead to strategies for prevention and treatment of chronic back and pelvic pain after pregnancy.[34],[35],[36]


  Conclusion Top


Gender differences in anatomy, physiology (especially hormonal effects), and psychological responses lead to differences in common pain conditions and management. There are more prevalence of chronic pain in women, especially FM, CPP, and chronic LPP caused by pregnancy. There are evidences supporting advanced chronic pain interventions for FM with tDCS and rTMS, diagnostic ultrasonography and ultrasound guided interventions for CPP, therapeutic exercises, physical activity and analgesic medications during pregnancy and lactation. However, the more well designed researches are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of these advanced interventions.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Maurer AJ, Lissounov A, Knezevic I, Candido KD, Knezevic NN. Pain and sex hormones: A review of current understanding. Pain Manag 2016;6:285-96.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Archey M, Goldey K, Crockett E, Boyette-Davis J. An Investigation of the effects of testosterone and behavioral expressions of pain on sex/gender differences in pain perception. Psychol Rep 2019;122:826-40.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Boerner KE, Chambers CT, Gahagan J, Keogh E, Fillingim RB, Mogil JS. Conceptual complexity of gender and its relevance to pain. Pain 2018;159:2137-41.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Johnson CM, Makai GE. Fibromyalgia and irritable bowel syndrome in female pelvic pain. Semin Reprod Med 2018;36:136-42.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Malfliet A, De Pauw R, Kregel J, Coppieters I, Meeus M, Roussel N, et al. Gender differences in the association of brain gray matter and pain-related psychosocial characteristics. Pain Physician 2019;22:E191-203.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Carniglia L, Ramírez D, Durand D, Saba J, Turati J, Caruso C, et al. Neuropeptides and microglial activation in inflammation, pain, and neurodegenerative diseases. Mediators Inflamm 2017;2017:5048616.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Coppieters I, Meeus M, Kregel J, Caeyenberghs K, De Pauw R, Goubert D, et al. Relations between brain alterations and clinical pain measures in chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review. J Pain 2016;17:949-62.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Clauw DJ. Fibromyalgia: A clinical review. JAMA 2014;311:1547-55.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bair MJ, Krebs EE. Fibromyalgia. Ann Intern Med 2020;172:ITC33-ITC48.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Ahmed S, Aggarwal A, Lawrence A. Performance of the American College of Rheumatology 2016 criteria for fibromyalgia in a referral care setting. Rheumatol Int 2019;39:1397-403.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Ghavidel-Parsa B, Bidari A, Hajiabbasi A, Shenavar I, Ghalehbaghi B, Sanaei O. Fibromyalgia diagnostic model derived from combination of American College of Rheumatology 1990 and 2011 criteria. Korean J Pain 2019;32:120-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Häuser W, Fitzcharles MA. Facts and myths pertaining to fibromyalgia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2018;20:53-62.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Galhardoni R, Correia GS, Araujo H, Yeng LT, Fernandes DT, Kaziyama HH, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic pain: A review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96:S156-72.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Mhalla A, Baudic S, Ciampi de Andrade D, Gautron M, Perrot S, Teixeira MJ, et al. Long-term maintenance of the analgesic effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in fibromyalgia. Pain 2011;152:1478-85.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Zhu CE, Yu B, Zhang W, Chen WH, Qi Q, Miao Y. Effiectiveness and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in fibromyalgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med 2017;49:2-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Scaturro D, Guggino G, Tumminelli LG, Ciccia F, Letizia Mauro G. An intense physical rehabilitation programme determines pain relief and improves the global quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2019;37:670-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lloyd DM, Wittkopf PG, Arendsen LJ, Jones AK. Is transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effective for the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain 2020. pii: S1526-5900(20)30004-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Knijnik LM, Dussán-Sarria JA, Rozisky JR, Torres IL, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for fibromyalgia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Pract 2016;16:294-304.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Lamvu G, Carrillo J, Witzeman K, Alappattu M. Musculoskeletal considerations in female patients with chronic pelvic pain. Semin Reprod Med 2018;36:107-15.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Peng PW, Tumber PS. Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures for patients with chronic pelvic pain – A description of techniques and review of literature. Pain Physician 2008;11:215-24.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Chen CP, Lew HL, Tang SF. Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection technique. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2015;94:82-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Han SH, Park KD, Cho KR, Park Y. Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided medial branch block for the treatment of lower lumbar facet joint pain: A retrospective comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e6655.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Chen CP, Lew HL, Tsai WC, Hung YT, Hsu CC. Ultrasound-guided injection techniques for the low back and hip joint. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90:860-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Chen CPC, Chen JL, Ho CS, Suputtitada A. Ultrasound-guided Medial Branch Blocks, Facet Joint, and Multifidus Muscle Injections: How It Is Done under One Needle Insertion Point! Anesthesiology 2020;132:582-3.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Bendtsen TF, Parras T, Moriggl B, Chan V, Lundby L, Buntzen S, et al. Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block at the entrance of the pudendal (Alcock) canal: Description of anatomy and clinical technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016;41:140-5.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Chen CP, Shen CY, Lew HL. Ultrasound-guided injection of the piriformis muscle. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2011;90:871-2.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Larsen EC, Wilken-Jensen C, Hansen A, Jensen DV, Johansen S, Minck H, et al. Symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnancy. I: Prevalence and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:105-10.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
To WW, Wong MW. Factors associated with back pain symptoms in pregnancy and the persistence of pain 2 years after pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:1086-91.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Svensson HO, Andersson GB, Hagstad A, Jansson PO. The relationship of low-back pain to pregnancy and gynecologic factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:371-5.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Park SB. The role of ultrasound in the evaluation of acute pelvic pain in pregnancy and postpartum period: A review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2018;30:369-77.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Black E, Khor KE, Kennedy D, Chutatape A, Sharma S, Vancaillie T, et al. Medication use and pain management in pregnancy: A critical review. Pain Pract 2019;19:875-99.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Davenport MH, Marchand AA, Mottola MF, Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Jaramillo Garcia A, et al. Exercise for the prevention and treatment of low back, pelvic girdle and lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2019;53:90-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Chan CW, Au Yeung E, Law BM. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions on pregnancy-related outcomes among pregnant women: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:1840.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Tower AM, Frishman GN. Cesarean scar defects: An underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20:562-72.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Landau R, Bollag L, Ortner C. Chronic pain after childbirth. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013;22:133-45.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Komatsu R, Ando K, Flood PD. Factors associated with persistent pain after childbirth: A narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2020;124:e117-30.  Back to cited text no. 36
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusion
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed242    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]