• Users Online: 241
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year :   |  Volume :   |  Issue :   |  Page :

Outcomes after acute inpatient rehabilitation following epilepsy surgery: A case series


1 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Missouri Medical Center, Columbia, MO, USA
3 Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA

Correspondence Address:
David Sherwood,
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2201 Children's Way, Suite 1318, Nashville, TN 37212
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/JISPRM-000116

Objective: To describe functional outcomes following discharge from an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) in patients following epilepsy surgery, comparing laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) versus surgical resection for epilepsy. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Academic tertiary hospital. Participants: Eight patients who received LITT (n = 3) or surgical resection (n = 5) for epilepsy. Interventions: Acute inpatient rehabilitation. Main Outcome Measures: Functional independence measure (FIM), seizure incidence, discharge destination. Level of Evidence: IV. Results: The epilepsy cohort demonstrated a FIM change of 38.88 (vs. national average 29.55), average length of stay (LOS) of 15.13 days (vs. 13.38 days), and LOS efficiency was 3.4 (vs. 2.68). No patients in the epilepsy cohort were discharged to acute care hospital compared to a national average of 9.82%. Eighty-seven percent in the epilepsy cohort discharged to home (vs. 77%) and 12.5% to skilled nursing facility (vs. 11.90%). Between the subset who received LITT and those who received surgical resection, there was no statistically significant change in mean total FIM change (43.7 vs. 36), FIM efficiency (5.3 vs. 2.2), or FIM change in subset measures of memory (0.5 vs. 0.25) or problem solving (0 vs. 0.8). There was no statistical significance between groups in adverse events, including seizure. Conclusions: Outcome measures in this population appear to be consistent with national outcome measures for other IRF diagnoses. This suggests that acute inpatient rehabilitation should be considered after patients undergo surgical intervention for epilepsy. However, a larger sample size and controlled studies are necessary before generalizations can be made. In addition, no statistically significant functional difference was seen between patients who underwent LITT or surgical resection.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 [NEXT]
 [PREV]
 Table of Contents

  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Sherwood D
    -  Tran A
    -  Gill B
    -  Westerhaus B
    -  Arickx A
    -  Landazuri P
    -  Eickmeyer S
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed142    
    PDF Downloaded3    

Recommend this journal